(This article is a follow-up to my earlier piece: Of Cowards, Critics, and the Call to Contribute, where I explored the culture of criticism, silence, and the need for constructive national engagement.)
In a nation where progress is measured not just by development projects but by public trust and national unity, a group of unsung heroes continues to labour quietly: Brunei’s civil servants.
Often vilified in public discourse and social media chatter, many government officers work far beyond the call of duty, quietly serving the nation without expecting recognition.
Yet their efforts are rarely celebrated; instead, they are drowned under the weight of criticism, some valid, but many fueled by hearsay and shallow understanding.
"Sometimes, it feels like no matter how hard we work, it's never enough," shared a young officer recently. "We don't just work to earn a living; we work to serve."
Her words are not an isolated sentiment but an echo of the silent frustration felt across the public sector.
Public and private conversations today often carry a tone of frustration.
As one commentator pointed out, during crises such as the COVID-19 pandemic, many became instant "experts," blaming and criticising rather than offering solutions.
The real question remains: What are we going to do about it?
Those who truly care about Brunei's future must move beyond criticism to provide suggestions, propose a way forward, and constructively engage with authorities.
Brunei's working culture in the public service is shaped by deep respect for hierarchy, risk aversion, and an overwhelming emphasis on protocol over engagement.
Officers tread cautiously when dealing with the media or the public, often avoiding open communication for fear of overstepping.
The prevailing mentality still echoes the blunt statement I once received as a young reporter: "We don't work for the media."
This cautious working culture, combined with Brunei's top-down political system, fosters an environment where proactive, transparent communication is not just rare — it is discouraged.
Many officers, no matter how dedicated, are trapped within structures that silence rather than empower them to communicate with the people they serve.
Meanwhile, the media landscape itself struggles.
Once vibrant, it is now reduced to a handful of surviving private outlets such as Borneo Bulletin and Media Permata, alongside state-run platforms like Pelita Brunei and RTB.
Journalism has largely been reduced to press release reporting, with little room for investigative depth or independent scrutiny.
While the internet has expanded access to information, the tight narrative controls and cautious reporting norms have left a critical void.
In many cases, what remains can be described as patronising journalism — content that highlights only the positives, praises authority without question, and avoids meaningful scrutiny.
While intended to preserve stability, this approach risks alienating an increasingly discerning public who yearn for authenticity, critical thought, and genuine engagement.
In the absence of bold, credible, and timely communication, rumours, frustration, and mistrust thrive.
Recurring patterns vividly demonstrate this communication gap: during the rollout of various public service initiatives over the years, public confusion has often escalated due to delayed, inconsistent information from official sources.
In many instances, social media filled the void with half-truths and frustrations, damaging public confidence in reforms that might otherwise have been well received.
This was particularly evident when public debates flared up around proposed restrictions on online forums, exposing a widespread public fear that tighter media controls would further suffocate civic space.
Effective Public Relations (PR) is not a luxury. It is the lifeline of good governance.
It builds trust, ensures transparency, and connects government institutions to the people they serve.
Press releases, social media engagement, public outreach, media interviews, and proactive dialogues are not optional extras.
They are critical components of modern public service.
But beyond technical fixes, true public relations must be grounded in deeper values — the timeless Islamic principles that characterised the leadership of Prophet Muhammad SAW: Sidiq (truthfulness), Amanah (trustworthiness), Tabligh (clear communication and cascading of information), and Fatanah (wisdom).
These principles formed the ethical foundation of his leadership, ensuring trust, clarity, and wisdom in governance and communication.
As Caliph Umar ibn Al-Khattab (RA) wisely said:
"The most beloved of leaders to the people is the one who strives for their welfare, and the most hated is the one who seeks to burden them."
Leadership, therefore, is a trust that demands sincerity, clarity, and compassion.
- Sidiq demands that the government speak the truth consistently, clearly, and courageously. -
- Amanah requires public servants to honour the trust placed in them by serving sincerely and responsibly. -
- Tabligh goes beyond mere announcements; it insists on effective cascading of information from leadership to every level, ensuring that policies are clearly understood and implemented with unity and clarity. -
- Fatanah calls for wisdom in balancing firmness with compassion, especially when facing public criticism.
If Brunei’s public sector truly wishes to rebuild public trust, then these values must not merely be quoted in speeches.
They must be woven into daily practice, into every public statement, every engagement with the media, and every internal briefing.
Without effective cascading communication, policies risk being misunderstood or poorly implemented, leading to frustration both within the service and among the public.
Clarity must flow from the top down through every directorate, department, and frontline service counter.
A positive example of effective cascading communication was seen during the nationwide rollout of the BruHealth application during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Clear guidelines, proactive public briefings, and consistent messaging across ministries helped achieve rapid public compliance and understanding, demonstrating that when communication flows properly, national initiatives can succeed smoothly.
Despite the success of initiatives like BruHealth, communication gaps persist across other areas of public service.
Increasingly, even the youth are expressing frustration, seeking platforms for safe civic engagement and common dialogue.
As one young respondent asked: "Can we share a common platform?"
Their question reflects a growing yearning for constructive participation in national development, not just passive observation or criticism.
This growing desire for civic participation, however, is not without risks.
As another well-wisher warned, bold voices calling for reform may unsettle certain entrenched interests.
The corridors of power are often more threatened by constructive criticism than by silence.
Nevertheless, the will to speak up for a better Brunei must remain steadfast. We are not alone.
Hope for a better future is a shared aspiration across borders and generations.
Moreover, suppressing traditional media and curbing online platforms not only stifles public discourse but threatens the very foundation of good governance.
Without a free and responsible press, there can be no meaningful checks and balances.
Governments operate without significant scrutiny; inefficiencies and mismanagement remain hidden, and public trust continues to erode.
Transparency is not merely a virtue; it is an economic and social necessity, critical for attracting investments, encouraging innovation, and fostering a well-informed citizenry.
In a time when the public demands faster answers, more transparency, and greater accountability, the solution does not lie in defensiveness or silence.
It lies in embracing a communication culture rooted in the timeless Islamic principles of Sidiq (truthfulness), Amanah (trustworthiness), Tabligh (clear communication and effective cascading of information), and Fatanah (wisdom).
As a young officer reflected, "We inherited a legacy of problems. Fixing it will take a united nation."
Unity will not come from slogans; it must be built through trust. And trust, ultimately, is built by speaking truthfully, wisely, and by being truly present for the people.
If the silent frontliners are given a voice — and the trust to speak sincerely, wisely, and courageously — Brunei can nurture a stronger, more united nation ready to face its future with confidence.
Brunei’s public service has a heart. Now, it must also find its voice. (MHO/04/2025)
#CallToContribute #NationBuilding #SilentFrontliners