From Muscat to Riyadh: Old Friendships in a New Season

From Muscat to Riyadh, with Beijing in the background, Brunei’s diplomatic friendships are gaining new significance. But can royal visits and strategic partnerships deliver beyond ceremonial promises? With economic diversification increasingly urgent, the real challenge is turning diplomatic goodwill into investment, sustainable jobs and tangible prosperity for Bruneians.

KopiTalk with MHO

A historic royal visit from Oman and a call to Saudi Arabia show Brunei's longstanding Gulf ties gaining fresh relevance. The harder work is turning goodwill into meaningful cooperation and trade.

By Malai Hassan Othman

6 November 2026

In 2014, Oman's Minister of Heritage and Culture visited Brunei. This week, the same man returned as Sultan.

His Majesty Sultan Haitham bin Tarik, the Sultan of Oman, made a state visit from 2 to 4 November, the first by a reigning Omani Sultan to Brunei. At the state banquet, he recalled that earlier visit.

The two sultanates elevated their relations to a Strategic Partnership. They signed five agreements covering visa exemptions for specified official passports, agriculture and fisheries, labour, economic planning and health.

On 5 November, His Royal Highness Prince 'Abdul Mateen, Minister of Foreign Affairs, telephoned Saudi Arabia's Minister of Foreign Affairs, Prince Faisal bin Farhan Al Saud.

Is the Gulf suddenly discovering Brunei? Not quite. What is changing is the world around friendships built over four decades.

Hormuz Is Closer Than It Looks

Sultan Haitham came to Brunei directly from Beijing. There, he and President Xi Jinping called for renewed dialogue between Iran and the United States and safe navigation through the Strait of Hormuz.

That strait matters to Brunei. Our economy remains deeply dependent on oil and gas, while our downstream industries and international trade rely on secure shipping routes.

During their discussions at Istana Nurul Iman, His Majesty Sultan Haji Hassanal Bolkiah Mu'izzaddin Waddaulah ibni Al-Marhum Sultan Haji Omar 'Ali Saifuddien Sa'adul Khairi Waddien, Sultan and Yang Di-Pertuan of Brunei Darussalam, stressed freedom of navigation under international law.

Baginda Sultan also expressed concern about Middle East tensions and commended Oman's longstanding efforts to facilitate dialogue and regional stability.

Oman has maintained channels of communication across political divides, sometimes helping adversaries return to the negotiating table when other avenues have narrowed.

The diplomatic significance extends beyond the Gulf. China's economic interests are closely linked to Middle Eastern energy supplies, while Southeast Asia depends on secure maritime routes and predictable international trade.

The overlapping interests in peace, energy security and economic cooperation are therefore understandable.

Still, Beijing to Bandar Seri Begawan represents a sequence of established diplomatic relationships, not evidence of a new alliance. Nothing publicly announced indicates that Brunei has joined a Middle East mediation initiative.

But the wider convergence of interests deserves attention.

The Number Nobody Mentioned

Sultan Haitham was candid. He described Brunei as a gateway to Asian markets, while Oman could connect Brunei with the Gulf, Middle East and Africa.

He also acknowledged that trade between the two countries had not kept pace with the warmth of their diplomatic relationship.

The figures illustrate the gap.

According to UN Comtrade-derived statistics, Oman's reported merchandise trade with Brunei amounted to approximately US$103,000 in 2024.

Compare that with Oman's total international merchandise trade of approximately 41.7 billion Omani rials in the same year. Bilateral exchanges barely register against the country's wider trading activity.

People-to-people exchanges also remain modest. Omani statistics recorded only 126 visitors from Brunei during the first nine months of 2026.

Yet the foundation for meaningful cooperation already exists.

The Oman Brunei Investment Company (OBIC), established in 2009, acquired a 50 per cent stake in Golden Corporation, a Brunei-based aquaculture enterprise, in 2019.

That investment offers a practical example of how diplomatic goodwill can translate into business activity, employment and export opportunities.

It also demonstrates that cooperation need not be confined to oil and gas.

The opportunities are potentially much broader.

As Gulf economies strengthen their relationships with China and Southeast Asia, Brunei could become a useful partner in investment, logistics, energy, food security and regional commerce.

China brings industrial capacity and extensive trading networks. The Gulf offers energy resources, investment capital and established commercial connections. Brunei offers longstanding relationships and a place within the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN).

These complementary interests do not imply a coordinated four-country arrangement. They do, however, provide opportunities for closer partnerships in an increasingly interconnected economy.

The question is whether Brunei has the commercial readiness to make those opportunities worthwhile.

A gateway requires more than geographical advantage and friendly governments. It needs efficient infrastructure, competitive businesses, capable institutions and reliable connections to international markets.

The newly signed agreements on agriculture, fisheries, labour, economic planning and health should therefore be judged by what they eventually deliver.

So, a few polite questions for the relevant ministries. Who will lead implementation? What targets have been established? When can the public expect the first progress report?

Diplomatic goodwill opens doors. Someone must still do the business.

The Call to Riyadh

The Saudi telephone conversation should be viewed in perspective.

Prince Faisal regularly engages foreign counterparts, and the Saudi Press Agency reported only a review of bilateral cooperation, ways to strengthen it and matters of mutual interest.

The call was initiated from the Bruneian side.

That detail is noteworthy, although it would be premature to interpret a single exchange as evidence of a new regional diplomatic strategy.

Brunei was already engaging Gulf partners as the Middle East crisis intensified. In March, its foreign-policy discussions included contacts with Riyadh and Doha.

The latest conversation therefore fits a pattern of continuing engagement rather than an abrupt change in direction.

Beyond bilateral diplomacy, relations between ASEAN and the Gulf Cooperation Council are also developing, opening possibilities for trade, investment and cooperation across a wider range of sectors.

Brunei has an interest in those relationships, not only as an energy producer but as a nation seeking new sources of economic growth.

The challenge is to ensure that international cooperation creates opportunities for Bruneian businesses and workers, rather than becoming another collection of promising declarations.

In diplomacy, steady often matters more than sudden.

Small Country, Long Memory

Brunei cannot match China's industrial capacity or the economic weight of the Gulf's larger powers. But trust, consistency and longstanding relationships also carry value. They take decades to cultivate.

Diplomatic relations with Oman began on 24 March 1984, the year Brunei resumed full independence. Baginda Sultan visited Oman in 1984, 1985 and 2009, and has now received another invitation.

Sultan Haitham's own association with Brunei predates his accession to the throne. His return as Sultan gives this week's visit a personal and historical significance beyond ceremonial protocol.

The Strategic Partnership is a framework, not a finished building. Its worth will be measured by cooperation sustained, projects completed, jobs created and Bruneian enterprises that grow because of it.

There is also a larger question.

Can a small nation play a meaningful role in a world increasingly shaped by geopolitical rivalry and economic uncertainty?

Size does not determine every form of influence. A country's relevance may also depend on the relationships it maintains, the confidence it inspires and its ability to connect different interests.

Brunei does not need to become a major power to contribute constructively to international cooperation. But it must recognise where its strengths lie and how those strengths can serve national interests.

The diplomatic developments of this week may be separate expressions of longstanding friendship. Equally, they may reflect a broader convergence of interests as countries seek stability and dependable partnerships.

The evidence does not establish a coordinated diplomatic initiative. It does, however, suggest that familiar relationships are acquiring fresh significance in a changing world.

For Brunei, the opportunity lies in translating that significance into lasting national benefits.

During the state visit, the two Sultans inaugurated a photographic exhibition in Bandar Seri Begawan titled *Bridging the Sultanates*.

The title fits.

Brunei may be small on the world map, but a nation's significance is not always determined by the space it occupies.

Sometimes, it is measured by the bridges it can build.

A Wall Built on Amanah, Not Fear

A nation’s sovereignty is only as strong as the public service guarding it. But what happens when fear replaces integrity, bureaucracy stifles initiative, and citizens are left waiting? His Majesty calls for transformation. The question is whether those entrusted with amanah are prepared to act, not merely obey.

K O P I T A L K W I T H M H O

His Majesty calls the public service the nation’s wall of sovereignty. The titah also shows how
that wall must be built.

By Malai Hassan Othman
 

Benteng kedaulatan. A wall that guards the nation's sovereignty.

That is how His Majesty Sultan Haji Hassanal Bolkiah Mu'izzaddin Waddaulah ibni Al-Marhum
Sultan Haji Omar 'Ali Saifuddien Sa'adul Khairi Waddien, Sultan and Yang Di-Pertuan of Brunei
Darussalam, described the public service at the close of the 33rd Public Service Day in Berakas on
29 October.

His Majesty said sovereignty depends not on physical defence alone, but on effective
administration. An honest officer defends the country against corruption, abuse of power and the
collapse of institutions.

The logic is simple. If the public service is weak, the wall is weak. And a weak wall leaves
everything it guards exposed: the nation, its people, the Monarchy and the faith.

Integrity is therefore not only a personal virtue. It is a matter of national sovereignty.

Every wall invites the same question: what is it made of? A public service built to protect its own
status quo can stand for years. It keeps out threats, but also ideas and reform. Sooner or later, it
cracks from within.

The titah points to a different material: integrity, initiative and service.

Rooted in Melayu Islam Beraja (MIB), public office is an amanah to the Raja, nation and people.

Why now

Vendors have waited. In June 2024, the Ministry of Finance and Economy publicly apologised for
payment delays following the introduction of a new treasury system. For a small contractor, an
unpaid invoice is not paperwork. It is wages, rent and a bank loan.

Projects have stalled. Official figures as at 31 March 2024 showed that only 54 of 221 projects
under the 11th National Development Plan had been completed. In August 2026, the Council again
heard about the causes of project delays.

The service struggles to house its own. On 3 August, the Legislative Council heard that 1,092 civil
servants were on the Public Service Department's waiting list for government housing, including
684 in Division IV, with average waits of one to four years.

The poor have waited too. In August, meeting the Brunei Islamic Religious Council, His Majesty
questioned delays in assistance to asnaf fakir miskin. Why, His Majesty asked, had such matters
been allowed to continue for so long? Earlier warnings, His Majesty said, had been like mencurah
air di daun keladi.

These are not merely failures of delivery. They can breed disappointment, frustration and a loss of
keyakinan in the administration, eroding the loyalty and trust that hold the wall together.

That is the backdrop to 29 October, and the real test of the wall.

A wall of fear

A wall can be built from fear. Fear of the superior. Fear of the mistake that damages a career. Fear
of saying aloud what everyone already knows.

Fear does not produce integrity. It produces caution of the wrong kind.

The frightened officer does not decide. He minutes the file upwards. He finds the regulation that
lets him say no, because no has never cost anyone a promotion.

One online commenter, recalling an attachment in a government office, described ideas ending up
in the dustbin, only to reappear under someone else's name. The junior was rejected, not the idea.
Tikam belakang, the commenter called it.

Every office knows the little Napoleon. He rules a small kingdom of files, treating requests as
favours, juniors as threats and questions as insubordination.

Petty authoritarianism corrodes the very integrity His Majesty expects the public service to defend.

When backstabbing becomes office culture and bullying becomes management style, initiative
dies. Officers who fear questioning a process will eventually stop questioning anything.

A workplace where an officer can raise a concern or report misconduct without punishment is not a
perk. It is part of the wall.

This is not an argument against discipline or accountability. The danger begins when compliance
becomes a hiding place from judgement.

A wall of amanah

His Majesty reminded officers that their posts are not merely jobs, but amalan yang
dipertanggungjawabkan oleh Raja dan Negara — responsibilities entrusted by the Raja and nation.
Nobody should need frightening into honouring an amanah.

Support for leadership, the titah said, is bukan sekadar retorik atau simbolik. It must be
demonstrated through diligent work and precise implementation.

Loyalty is proven at the desk, not performed in the meeting room.

Jangan hanya setakat mendengar, tetapi perlu melaksanakannya, dan jangan juga sekadar setuju,
tetapi perlu menyempurnakannya.

"Do not merely listen; act upon what you hear. And do not merely agree; see it through to
completion."

Fear produces attentive listeners and agreeable subordinates. Finished work requires officers
willing to own decisions and risk honest mistakes.

The stamp and the counter

Anyone who has stood at a government counter knows the other side. An application returned for
one missing photocopy. A complaint answered with a regulation instead of a solution.

A procedure should be the road to a decision, not a toll gate.

In August, Yang Berhormat Dr Awang Haji Mahali bin Haji Momin warned the Legislative
Council against a culture of passing responsibility between ministries. Necessary bureaucracy must
not become red tape.

His Majesty posed a more fundamental test: have public services truly made people's lives easier
while demonstrating loyalty to the Raja and nation?

In that test, easing the lives of the rakyat is how loyalty is shown. An officer who delays a citizen
to assert his importance is not guarding the wall. He is loosening a brick.

His Majesty's instruction was plain: perbaikilah dengan tindakan dan bukan keluhan. Correct them
through action, not complaints.

One online reader asked whether transformation begins after the meeting or after makan.

Another suggested inspecting problems at night and in heavy rain, before complaints reach Talian
Darussalam.

That is turun padang. Go to the problem instead of waiting for it to queue at the counter.

What the index cannot see

His Majesty noted Brunei's position in Transparency International's 2025 Corruption Perceptions
Index (CPI): 31st among 182 countries and second in ASEAN after Singapore.

Transparency International gave Brunei a score of 63 out of 100. But the CPI measures perceived
public-sector corruption, not how long an application takes. A clean ranking and an efficient
service are cousins, not twins.

A service where juniors fear raising problems will send good news upwards. Fear does not only
slow the service. It blinds it.

So a few questions for the Public Service Department.

Are agencies publishing actual performance against their Tekad Pemedulian Orang Ramai (TPOR),
or Client's Charter, commitments? When targets are missed, what changes? Are officers rewarded
for solving problems or avoiding mistakes? Can juniors report bottlenecks or bullying without
risking their careers?

The wall cannot be repaired if those responsible for maintaining it are afraid to report the cracks.

Muraqabah

Islam has a word for this integrity.

Muraqabah is the awareness that Allah sees what the supervisor does not.

Rules enforced by watching last only while somebody watches. Integrity rooted in muraqabah
remains at the desk after everyone has gone home.

His Majesty closed with four qualities: obedience, wisdom, readiness for change and steadfast
values.

Taat, bijaksana, pantas, teguh.

Obedience can be commanded. Wisdom cannot. Nor can initiative be frightened into existence.

Benteng kedaulatan will not be built with the stick, nor bought with the carrot.

It is laid brick by brick, by officers who keep their amanah when nobody is watching.

The Silent Crisis We Cannot Afford to Ignore

Nine lives lost in one year. In Brunei, that averaged one suicide every six weeks. Behind the figures are families left grieving. Beyond the hotline numbers and awareness campaigns, what happens after someone seeks help? Who follows through? And are we asking enough of those entrusted with protecting vulnerable lives?

  

KopiTalk with MHO

The Silent Crisis We Cannot Afford to Ignore

Nine lives were lost to suicide in Brunei in 2025. The public deserves to know what happens after a person first reaches out for help.

By Malai Hassan Othman

 

The news shook me. A young Bruneian man had reportedly died by suicide. It reached me through a close friend in Belait and left an uncomfortable question.

How much suffering remains unseen among people we greet every day?

I did not know him personally, and the circumstances have not been independently verified. His family deserves privacy. Yet the concern reaches well beyond one grieving household.

I grew up at a time when suicide was seldom spoken of in the community around me. Silence offered little reassurance then. It offers little now.

On 10 October, the Ministry of Health reported five suicide deaths in 2024 and nine in 2025.

In 2025, somewhere in Brunei, a life was lost to suicide on average every six weeks. Behind each death was suffering the annual figures cannot reveal.

Two years of figures do not establish a long-term trend. But nine lives lost in a single year should trouble the conscience of a country as closely connected as ours.

Do these losses hold our attention beyond the day the figures appear in the news?

The Ministry’s World Mental Health Day message also recorded approximately 17,014 patients receiving psychiatric or psychological treatment in 2025. Talian Harapan 145 received 2,515 calls that year.

A large proportion of callers were aged 18 to 35. The call total does not tell us how many different people called, or how many faced suicidal crisis.

People are reaching out. What these figures cannot show is the help they receive, particularly after that first call.

After the call

The hotline and the professionals providing mental-health care deserve recognition. Their work places them close to distress that most of us encounter only occasionally, if at all.

Yet the number of calls answered leaves an important question open: what happens next?

An answered call records contact. It does not, by itself, tell the public whether an urgent assessment followed, treatment began, or support continued afterwards.

Who remains responsible when a person needs further care? That answer should be clear within the service and understandable to the family trying to obtain help.

We do not know whether any of those who died in 2025 had contacted Talian Harapan. The figures provide no basis for blaming the service.

The Ministry of Health should explain how crisis support connects with treatment, who follows up and how it checks that people receive the care they need.

Coordination is familiar language in official statements. For a worried family, its meaning is simpler: somebody knows the next step and helps them take it.

In August, I wrote in this column, “Brunei’s Human Asset at Risk?”, about how unemployment, mental distress, bullying and other pressures could overlap in the lives of the same young people.

Government departments encounter different parts of that experience. The young person lives through all of it, alongside family obligations, financial worries and uncertainty about the future.

Those pressures alone cannot establish why an individual died. They do help explain why care cannot rest entirely within the walls of a clinic or hospital ward.

My earlier “Burnout Nation” column approached the concern through working life. Employers, too, influence whether people have the time, security and confidence to seek help.

Wawasan Brunei 2035 depends upon people being able to build a future. Their wellbeing belongs within that ambition, although nobody should have to prove their economic worth to deserve care.

Guidance already given

His Majesty Sultan Haji Hassanal Bolkiah Mu’izzaddin Waddaulah ibni Al-Marhum Sultan Haji Omar ‘Ali Saifuddien Sa’adul Khairi Waddien, Sultan and Yang Di-Pertuan of Brunei Darussalam, addressed mental health at Majlis Ilmu 2024.

His Majesty called for continued cooperation between health and religious authorities, and urged families and society to support those recovering. His Majesty also raised the effectiveness of community mental-health training.

Two years on, the authorities should account for how that guidance has been carried forward.

A Ministry of Religious Affairs report described a 12-week course for imams, ustaz and daie, organised with the Ministry of Health and completed in October 2024.

Approximately 20 participants attended. The training brought Islamic perspectives and medical knowledge together, giving trusted religious figures a stronger grounding in mental health and available support.

The course ended. What followed?

The health and religious authorities should explain how participants have applied their training, how many more have been trained since and how its effectiveness is being assessed.

Reported suicide deaths rose from five in 2024 to nine in 2025. That increase does not establish that the training failed. It makes those answers more urgent.

An imam need not become a psychiatrist. His trusted position can help someone speak about distress, overcome embarrassment and find appropriate professional care without feeling that faith has been set aside.

The same practical understanding matters within families. Someone may notice withdrawal or despair yet hesitate, uncertain whether to speak, fearful of offending, or worried about gossip.

Families need clear advice on whom to approach and how to obtain help. Concern is easier to act upon when the next step is understood.

An amanah beyond awareness

A whole-of-nation response involves many institutions. Shared responsibility still needs a clear answer to a basic question: who follows the person when responsibility passes between services?

Without that clarity, even well-intentioned efforts risk leaving families to make the connections themselves. Privacy must remain protected throughout; seeking help should never mean surrendering dignity.

The Ministry of Health should publish an annual account of suicide-prevention work. Several years of figures would give the public a clearer picture of what is happening.

That account should show how quickly urgent cases are assessed, whether referrals lead to treatment and what has improved. No family’s identity needs to be exposed.

Call totals and course attendance show activity. How long people wait, whether they receive treatment and whether support continues tell us more about the care delivered.

The mainstream media has a responsibility beyond carrying official statements. Reporting the annual figures should begin a conversation about prevention and care that continues through the year.

Access to treatment, the experience of seeking help and the results of prevention programmes are public-interest stories worth pursuing, long after World Mental Health Day has passed.

Private accounts cannot establish the cause of a death, and no family should surrender its privacy for a newsroom to examine public policy.

Responsible reporting can protect the bereaved while asking difficult questions of those entrusted with care.

Amanah means a trust. In this work, it rests with institutions charged with providing care and with those of us who may be the first to notice someone struggling.

My thoughts return to that grieving family. Their loss needs no public explanation to deserve sympathy, and their privacy deserves the same care as their grief.

For others who are struggling, recovery remains possible. A timely conversation, appropriate treatment and continuing support can help people find their way through a difficult period.

The next person who reaches out needs more than a number to call. They need care that follows through, and authorities able to show that it does.

Need someone to talk to? If you or someone you know is struggling, call Talian Harapan 145, or speak to a qualified healthcare professional or a trusted person who can help you reach care. If there is immediate danger, call 991 for an ambulance or go to the nearest emergency department.

 

Sources

–      Ministry of Health World Mental Health Day message, reported by Pelita Brunei, 10 October 2026.

–      His Majesty’s titah, Majlis Ilmu 2024, Prime Minister’s Office.

–      Ministry of Religious Affairs report on basic mental-health training, 18 December 2024.

–      “Brunei’s Human Asset at Risk?”, KopiTalk with MHO, 23 August 2026.

–      “Burnout Nation: Why Brunei’s Work-Life Balance Promise Can’t Wait?”, KopiTalk with MHO, 2 April 2025.

When the Whole Nation Is Responsible, Who Is Accountable?

  

When unemployment is everyone’s responsibility, who answers for the young Bruneian still waiting? Job fairs offer hope. Employers demand experience. Policies promise progress. But where does shared responsibility become measurable accountability? A nation cannot build its future on applications alone. Someone must explain why opportunity keeps arriving as another announcement.

 

KOPITALK WITH MHO

When the Whole Nation Is Responsible, Who Is Accountable?

By Malai Hassan Othman

 

Brunei's unemployment problem has survived years of career fairs, manpower programmes, policy reviews and repeated appeals for a whole-of-nation approach. Yet the latest official figures suggest that what remains in short supply is not discussion, but measurable results.

Unemployment rose from 4.7 per cent in 2024 to 5.0 per cent in 2025, leaving approximately 11,600 people without work. Among those aged 18 to 24, unemployment stood at 18 per cent.

These figures were disclosed by Home Affairs Minister and Coordinating Minister for Social and Manpower Policies Dato Seri Setia Awang Haji Ahmaddin bin Haji Abdul Rahman during a Muzakarah session with Legislative Council members on October 26.

His willingness to acknowledge disappointing employment outcomes deserves recognition. So does his concern about inadequate wages and the difficulties young Bruneians face in securing their first employment opportunity.

After years of strategies, committees and initiatives, are we addressing the causes of unemployment or becoming increasingly efficient at administering its consequences?

When attendance becomes the story

One revealing disclosure concerned employment-matching sessions organised through Pusat Pekerjaan Brunei (JobCentre Brunei).

The minister reported that 4,026 jobseekers had been notified of matching opportunities. Of 124 candidates scheduled or called to attend, only 37 turned up.

It certainly was. But disappointment is not a diagnosis.

The absence of 87 candidates tells us what happened. It tells us almost nothing about why.

Were they given adequate notice? Were jobs suitable, and pay and conditions disclosed? Did transport or family responsibilities intervene?

And why were only 124 candidates scheduled or called when notifications reportedly reached 4,026 jobseekers?

Jobseekers certainly have responsibilities. They must demonstrate initiative, discipline and willingness to consider realistic opportunities.

But public employment agencies have an equally important responsibility to understand why their interventions produce disappointing responses.

The causes may involve candidate attitudes, unsuitable vacancies or shortcomings in employment matching.

A structured follow-up study, including feedback from absent candidates, is needed.

Otherwise, poor attendance risks becoming an explanation for unemployment when it may also be a symptom of weaknesses within the employment system.

Then there is the relationship between local recruitment requirements and permission to employ foreign workers.

Under the government's published procedures, employers seeking foreign manpower must first advertise vacancies through JobCentre Brunei, allowing local candidates an opportunity to apply.

Where locals apply, employers are given additional time to conduct recruitment procedures before proceeding through the relevant approval process.

Who verifies rejection reasons and whether selection criteria are reasonable?

Could personal networks or nationality-based preferences sometimes influence recruitment, particularly where local applicants are rejected and overseas candidates subsequently fill similar positions?

Such concerns require evidence. A recruiting officer’s nationality does not prove bias, and employers must be free to select competent workers.

But recruitment decisions should withstand reasonable scrutiny, particularly when local applicants are rejected and foreign workers subsequently occupy similar positions.

Were rejections documented and successful candidates demonstrably better qualified?

A job advertisement should represent a genuine opportunity for local employment, not merely a procedural requirement preceding foreign recruitment.

Brunei needs foreign workers where genuine labour shortages or specialist requirements exist. But local-first safeguards must be credible and enforced.

At Jelajah Kerjaya 2025, 1,682 vacancies attracted 15,080 visitors. Only 535 Bruneians reportedly secured private-sector employment, equivalent to 31.8 per cent of advertised vacancies.

The latest Jelajah Kerjaya attracted 11,085 visitors for 1,448 vacancies. Placement outcomes were still being monitored.

Such initiatives are useful. But organising successful events and delivering successful employment outcomes are not the same thing.

How many recruits stayed employed after a year, and at what wages?

A crowded career fair may produce an impressive photograph. A vacancy filled may produce a favourable statistic. Neither proves that a lasting career has been created.

Employment itself does not always guarantee economic security.

The minister revealed that more than 5,600 local workers earned less than BND500 monthly, including 345 individuals holding bachelor's degrees or higher qualifications.

The minimum-wage rules cover specified sectors and employment arrangements, so not every salary below BND500 necessarily breaches them.

A graduate earning less than BND500 may have escaped the unemployment statistics. Whether that individual has escaped economic hardship is another matter.

Brunei must confront unemployment and underemployment together.

Procurement and the national interest

Much public discussion revolves around persuading employers to recruit more Bruneians and encouraging jobseekers to improve their employability.

Both objectives are legitimate. Neither fully addresses where sufficient new employment opportunities will come from.

Businesses cannot sustainably recruit without demand, investment and confidence.

Training improves employability; it does not create demand for labour.

Public policy influences investment, diversification, regulation, infrastructure and business costs.

When employment opportunities remain limited, the question cannot rest solely on whether jobseekers are sufficiently adaptable or employers sufficiently cooperative.

It must also examine whether the economic environment is generating enough opportunities.

Part of that examination must turn inward. Concerns about slow approvals, overlapping requirements and poor coordination deserve scrutiny. Where such obstacles delay business expansion, employment opportunities may also be postponed. Removing unnecessary red tape may be among the least expensive ways to enable job creation.

The minister cited more than 80,000 foreign workers in the private sector as a possible avenue for gradual localisation.

Training, workforce planning and succession programmes can realise some of those opportunities.

Yet that number cannot be treated as 80,000 immediately available jobs for Bruneians.

Occupational requirements, experience, wages and business needs differ considerably.

Localisation can address some gaps; expanding productive industries addresses the larger challenge.

Government, GLCs, SOEs and major operators, including Brunei Shell Petroleum and associated organisations, shape livelihoods through their contracting decisions.

CAPEX, OPEX and commercial performance matter. But so does workforce development.

When immediate cost dominates, contractors can face pressure to suppress wages and training expenditure.

Whether existing procurement arrangements adequately balance commercial efficiency with workforce development remains an open question.

A cheaper contract may be poor national value if savings undermine employment continuity, skills and experienced local workers.

When a service contract changes hands, experienced employees performing the same work can suddenly face uncertain employment.

Shouldn't their experience and employment continuity receive reasonable consideration alongside the commercial terms?

Responsible procurement need not guarantee jobs regardless of performance. It should recognise human capital as part of national development.

Government-linked companies and state-owned enterprises warrant a closer look.

Publicly owned or influenced enterprises must fulfil commercial mandates, but their national development contribution also merits scrutiny.

How many meaningful jobs and routes into specialist or managerial positions do they create for Bruneians?

Do their contractors support training, local retention and skills transfer?

The answers will differ according to each organisation's ownership structure and mandate.

Nevertheless, their performance should form part of any credible assessment of national employment policy.

A whole-of-nation strategy cannot rely on private employers while leaving public investment, ownership and procurement unexamined.

Beyond the familiar appeal

A whole-of-nation approach is reasonable. Unemployment cannot be resolved by one ministry acting alone.

Government agencies, businesses, educational institutions, communities and jobseekers all have responsibilities.

Shared responsibility demands assigned duties, coordinated policies, measurable objectives and public reporting.

Who is responsible for generating employment demand? Who verifies fair recruitment? Who monitors retention, wages and career progression?

And who is accountable when programmes repeatedly fall short?

The minister himself called for targeted manpower planning, fair reward and effective worker protection.

The principles are therefore familiar.

What the public needs now is clearer evidence of implementation.

Perhaps the next employment discussion should begin with a report card: what was promised, achieved or missed, and what will change?

Nobody expects unemployment to disappear overnight. Global uncertainty, structural challenges and a small domestic market are genuine constraints.

But recognising those constraints should strengthen the determination to measure results, not diminish the obligation to explain them.

Government cannot employ everybody, but must lead an economic strategy that allows productive employment to expand.

A whole-of-nation approach should mean every relevant institution contributes towards a common objective.

It should never mean responsibility becomes so widely distributed that accountability disappears.

After all, the unemployed are not waiting for another committee to agree that unemployment is a serious problem.

They are waiting for opportunities to build a future.

Perhaps it is time we stopped measuring how often the nation discusses that future and started asking how many people can actually see one.

 

Malai Hassan Othman is a veteran journalist, columnist and policy advisor based in Brunei Darussalam.

A Map Without Clear Milestones

Cybercriminals have already cost Bruneians millions. But what happens when the next target is not your bank account, but the nation’s essential services? Brunei has cybersecurity laws, institutions and strategies. Are they keeping pace with evolving threats? In matters of national security and sovereignty, can we afford to discover weaknesses too late?

 

Brunei’s cyber threats are evolving. Its national strategy carries conflicting timetables, while the public has yet to receive a clear accounting of key readiness commitments.

By Malai Hassan Othman

KopiTalk with MHO | Part Two of Two: The Road Knows Where You Live

 

Cybercriminals have already taken millions of dollars from Bruneians. The money has gone through online scams, impersonation and other forms of digital deception, often beyond any hope of recovery.

 

In June 2025, the then Minister of Transport and Infocommunications, Yang Berhormat Pengiran Dato Seri Setia Shamhary bin Pengiran Dato Paduka Haji Mustapha, disclosed that online scams had cost victims BND12.2 million over three years.

 

The losses have continued. Between 10 March and 7 May this year, the Royal Brunei Police Force investigated 193 fraud cases involving BND1.85 million during Operation FRONTIER+ III, a Singapore-led crackdown on transnational scam networks.

 

Fourteen people were arrested locally. The cases ranged from impersonation of government officials to e-commerce fraud, social media impersonation and loan scams.

 

The two sets of figures cover different periods and should not be added together. Behind both are families whose savings and whose trust in digital services have been shaken.

 

The authorities have not stood still. Police investigations, awareness campaigns, telecommunications safeguards and cross-border operations all show sustained effort.

 

Yet the losses pose an awkward question. Are our defences stopping criminals, or are we simply getting better at counting the damage after the money has gone?

 

Scams are the threat Bruneians can see. The harder test is whether the country is prepared for the threats it cannot see.

 

The first part of this essay began with Malaysia’s decision to bar its civil servants from using Waze. The concern there was not theft but observation: the quiet record of where officials go, how often and when.

 

A phone or connected car can build that record without any system being hacked. Brunei has not publicly set out a distinct framework for managing the security implications of such commercial location data.

 

Observation is not the only risk. Brunei’s own National Cyber Security Strategy warns that state-sponsored actors are targeting critical information infrastructure, the systems behind energy, water, banking, healthcare and government.

 

The strategy cites a regional example. In 2022, a group known as Dark Pink, documented by the security firm Group-IB, attacked government and military bodies in Southeast Asia, including a Malaysian military body.

 

In a compact country, a serious disruption to one essential service could quickly reach others. That is a reason for preparation, not a claim that any system here has been compromised.

 

The warning has come from the very top. In his titah on the 35th National Day in 2019, His Majesty Sultan Haji Hassanal Bolkiah Mu’izzaddin Waddaulah ibni Al-Marhum Sultan Haji Omar ’Ali Saifuddien Sa’adul Khairi Waddien, Sultan and Yang Di-Pertuan of Brunei Darussalam, stressed that cyber security must be given special attention.

 

His Majesty cautioned that the negative effects of the cyber world could seep into the nation, society and the family.

 

Much has followed. Cyber Security Brunei was established in 2020. The Cybersecurity Act provides protections for designated critical systems, while the Personal Data Protection Order 2025 regulates personal data handled by organisations within its scope.

 

In September, Cyber Security Brunei released Version 2.0 of its Code of Practice for critical information infrastructure, adding clauses on artificial intelligence security and secure-by-design principles.

 

At the CySec 2026 conference that month, the Minister of Transport and Infocommunications, Yang Berhormat Dato Seri Setia Mohd Riza bin Dato Paduka Haji Mohd Yunos, gave the keynote address.

 

“Resilience must therefore be incorporated from the outset,” he said, covering how systems are designed, bought, developed, deployed and run. It was the right message, and a demanding one.

 

The difficulty lies with the document meant to guide all this. The national strategy, published in August 2023, carries the dates 2023–2027 on its cover.

 

Inside, its executive summary sets its objectives “within the 2022-2026 period”. Its implementation chapter is plainer still: the strategy “shall then be implemented for 5 years from 2022 to 2026”.

 

Cyber Security Brunei identifies 2023–2027 as the official period. The earlier dates in the published text do not establish a 2026 expiry, but they leave an avoidable ambiguity about the implementation timetable.

 

The world around the strategy has also moved. It was aligned with the Digital Economy Masterplan 2025, which has since been succeeded by Digital Brunei 2030.

 

The minister who signed its foreword now leads another ministry. His successor told a digital conference in August that Brunei must shift from planning to execution.

 

The threats have shifted too. The strategy’s threat chapter gives substantial attention to scams, ransomware, phishing and hijacked social media accounts.

 

Artificial intelligence is not addressed in it, though the updated Code of Practice has since begun to fill that gap. Nor does it set out a distinct approach to connected vehicles or commercial location data.

 

The strategy describes itself as a live document, to be revised at regular intervals. Its broad risk-management principles remain relevant even as technologies and threats change.

 

A new digital plan, an updated Code of Practice and the conflicting dates in the published strategy make this an appropriate moment to clarify milestones and review emerging risks.

 

The strategy also made promises that can be measured. It committed to a National Cyber Security Maturity Assessment, and to mechanisms providing “ongoing visibility” of progress towards its objectives.

 

No published findings could be located. Has the assessment been completed? What gaps did it identify, and which have since been closed?

 

Some findings must stay confidential. No country publishes a map of its own weak points, and none should.

 

But a progress report need not reveal vulnerabilities. It can state which assessments were carried out, which capabilities were strengthened and which priorities remain open.

 

A refreshed strategy could clarify its timetable, align implementation milestones with Digital Brunei 2030 and explain how progress will be measured.

 

An annual public update could identify completed assessments, strengthened capabilities and priorities still outstanding without disclosing sensitive technical details.

 

The strategy could also address connected vehicles and commercial location data more directly, building on recent measures covering artificial intelligence and secure-by-design principles.

 

And the response to scams could be measured not only by arrests, but also by attempted fraudulent transfers stopped before victims lose their money.

The scammers have already shown what happens when individuals are exposed. Their victims discovered the limits of their defences by losing their savings.

 

A nation should not discover its limits the same way. A strategy is a map for the road ahead. It serves the nation only when its milestones are clear, and when someone can show how far along the road we have come.