As the first meeting of the 20th session of the Legislative Council is set to convene today, February, 27th 2024, Bruneian citizens are standing on the verge, in equal anticipation and skepticism, of the deliberation that will evolve during the gathering at the Dewan Majlis Mesyuarat Negara Building.
Although the party line is that it will result in meaningful debates and policies designed to improve conditions from within the nation, an insightful examination of public opinion uncovers widespread disappointment and skepticism toward the value of debates from the Legislative Council.
His Majesty Sultan and Yang Di-Pertuan of Negara Brunei Darussalam Sultan Haji Hassanal Bolkiah Mu'izzaddin Waddaulah will grace the timeless tradition as he comes to attend the ceremonial inauguration of the Legislative Council within Brunei's Monarchical system.
Still, beyond the pomp and circumstance, there is a tangible sense of disconnect between what people want and how their legislators are perceived to be performing.
Critical in this year's meeting agenda is the 2024 Supply Bill, which deliberates and gets approved for the state fiscal year 2024/2025; it is a very important document that sets the fiscal landscape of the country. Yet beneath these formalities and procedural obligations runs a deep skeptical tone toward how such deliberations will truly improve the daily lives of Bruneian citizens.
A sample of the voices from across the corners of Brunei's digital sphere makes up one immense mosaic that composes the country's concern and grievances, yet all expressing a yearning for more. From public transport infrastructure to the infastructure made for tourists, which does nothing but harassing complaints by local citizens was a litany aimed at illustrating a prevailing sentiment of governmental apathy.
Critics bemoan the disharmony they believe exists between high-sounding ideals expressed in the Legislative Council and the actual affairs on the streets. Such ongoing disconnect between the legislative elite and the common people leads to harsh criticism. Scripted politics, accompanied by rehearsed arguments, receive analogies likening them to a theatrical performance, with comparisons drawn to a circus where performers recite lines like trained actors.
Most importantly, this disillusionment is further enhanced due to the fact that there are no specific action plans developed for major problems such as traffic congestion, lack of proper public transportation systems, or infrastructural delays. Although being hidden behind the cloak of procedural decorum, what does occur is that all of Brunei's citizens have a common voice filled with frustration with an in-touch legislative instrument.
But in the abundance of complaints, there were more than a few messages of resilience and political assertion. While the majority seemed indifferent, there existed a segment whose members cared enough about changing or rectifying something; these are conscientious citizens agitating for concrete action to some of the many problems besetting the country. Their voices, to a greater extent, are lost in the noise; but they still testify to human civilization and to civic activism in Brunei.
As the inaugural sitting of the Dewan Majlis gets underway, all will watch with rapt attention as the legislative elite thread a clever path through the intricate loom of Brunei governance.
Before a platform of skepticism and disenchantment, it is left to the Legislative Council to rise above the rhetoric of political theater and actually initiate reform that captures the imagination of the Brunei people.
It has to be a real discourse, accountability, and commitment to new transparency and principles of inclusiveness. Only then could the Legislative Council retrieve its mandate of being a true catalyst for moving forward to contribute towards building a nation of progress and prosperity. (MHO/FEBRUARY 2024)
No comments:
Post a Comment