KopiTalk LegCo Tracker · Second Meeting, Day One — Follow-Up (Report 2 of 2) · 4 August 2026
Nearly 15,000 Bruneians are actively job hunting. One of them, on a public forum, described private-sector work as being squeezed dry. On the same day, a coordinating minister asked Council to trust a new structure that still has no named delivery owner for each target, no published baseline, and no date by which anyone will know if it worked.
By Malai Hassan Othman
Someone wrote it in Malay, on a public forum, a few hours after the minister's numbers went up. Private sector's been squeezed dry, they said. Running out of ideas. Not giving up — but it's hard work trying to bend bamboo that's already gone stiff. Nobody asked them to testify before Council. Nobody will. But their sentence sat underneath a statistic Yang Berhormat Dato Seri Setia Awang Haji Ahmaddin bin Haji Abdul Rahman, Coordinating Minister for Social Policies and Manpower and Minister of Home Affairs, had just read into the record: 14,976 people, active job seekers as of June, seventy-nine per cent of them between twenty-one and thirty-five.
Nearly a third hold a bachelor's degree or higher. Another third have secondary education or below. The rest hold technical or vocational qualifications. YB Dato Seri Setia Ahmaddin named the pressures behind those numbers plainly — skills mismatches, thin work experience, transport access, family circumstances, health conditions, salary expectations, industries that keep changing shape under people's feet. "Addressing unemployment requires closer coordination between government agencies, educational institutions, industry, social agencies and the wider community," he said. Then he drew a line most ministers don't draw out loud: of 22,274 people who received assistance from the Department of Zakat, Waqaf and Baitulmal (JUZWAB) and the Department of Community Development (JAPEM) between January 2023 and 24 July this year, 52.3 per cent were unemployed. Welfare and joblessness, in his own framing, are the same problem wearing two different departments.
That was the morning's most honest moment. It was not its biggest one.
The biggest one, on paper, was Usul No. 4/2026 — Council's endorsement of three new Coordinating Ministers, for National Security, for Economic Policies, and for Social Policies and Human Resources. Yang Berhormat Pehin Datu Lailaraja Major General (Rtd) Dato Paduka Seri Awang Haji Halbi bin Haji Mohd Yussof, the new Coordinating Minister for National Security, told Council that with under a decade left to 2035, ministries can no longer work in silos. He set out seven priorities his cluster now owns — crime and public order, border security, cybersecurity, economic security, food security, energy security, social security — and new coordination meetings meant to close implementation gaps and stop mandates overlapping. He was careful to say major decisions still go to His Majesty regardless of the new layer, and he welcomed Council pushing back on it rather than waving it through.
Elsewhere, the day delivered one real answer. Yang Berhormat Dato Seri Setia Awang Haji Muhammad Juanda bin Haji Abdul Rashid, Minister of Development, told Council that his ministry has been reviewing housing-scheme eligibility since July — jointly with the Coordinating Minister for Social Policies and Manpower — weighing what different income levels can actually afford, and looking at bringing in banks, investors and local developers to build faster. It answered Yang Berhormat Awang Salleh bin Haji Othman's question directly. It did not answer Yang Berhormat Awang Haji Daud bin Jihan's, asked the same morning: how many civil servants are on the waiting list, and how long they've been there. That number was not provided to Council.
Some members of the public noticed the gap between the two registers — a minister with real figures and a motion with almost none. Most of the reaction online was the kind Council will never read twice: jokes about a circus, about fancy words that don't fix anything. But one longer post took the motion seriously enough to take it apart. It credited Council with sharper questions than usual — more members now asking for data, Key Performance Indicators (KPIs), cost-benefit numbers, not just intentions. And then it said the thing the motion itself doesn't say: that a Coordinating Minister structure only means something if it comes with a named authority, a public dashboard tracking every national target against a baseline, and reporting at least twice a year. Without that, it argued, the risk isn't failure. The risk is a new layer of coordination that spends its energy coordinating itself.
The numbers were honest on Day One. The structure is real. But bamboo that's already gone stiff will not bend because more committees are formed to study it. The fix needs a name attached to it, and a date by which results are supposed to be visible. Neither has been given yet.

No comments:
Post a Comment