When Justice Becomes Too Complicated for the Ordinary Citizen

  

You believe your rights have been overlooked. You have the documents, but do you understand the law well enough to defend yourself?

For ordinary Bruneians, navigating legal procedures can be daunting, especially without professional guidance.

How can we make the journey towards justice more accessible while upholding fairness, judicial independence and our values of adil dan ihsan?

KopiTalk with MHO

Why understanding the law, defending one's rights and simply reaching a courtroom can cost more than many Bruneians can afford.

By Malai Hassan Othman

Imagine an ordinary Bruneian walking into a courtroom, certain he has been wronged and determined to be heard.

He carries a folder of documents, years of correspondence and a clear memory of what happened. He believes the facts will speak for themselves.

He soon learns otherwise. A grievance is not the same as a claim the law will enforce. Knowing what happened is not the same as proving it.

There are procedures to follow, deadlines to meet, arguments to build and strict rules on what evidence the court may admit.

Across the room may sit an organisation represented by seasoned counsel, with research support, time and resources he cannot hope to match.

Both parties answer to the same law. The real question is whether both are equally equipped to use it.

This is not a complaint against our judiciary. The question is simpler, and harder to dismiss: can ordinary citizens actually exercise the rights the law gives them?

When the Law Becomes a Language of Its Own

To lawyers, words such as jurisdiction, limitation, admissibility and burden of proof are working tools. To the ordinary citizen, they can sound like a foreign language.

A man may believe a signed agreement proves his right to payment. The law may first ask who was bound by it, whether it is enforceable and whether he has sued the right party.

He may hold documents that support his account, then discover they must be introduced in a particular way before the court can consider them.

He may feel he was treated unfairly, only to learn that unfairness, dishonesty and illegality are separate questions in law, each with its own test.

These distinctions exist for good reason. They let courts decide disputes consistently and protect everyone from claims that cannot be proven.

Yet they leave a hard question. How does a person without legal training grasp them before spending his savings on a claim he believes is just?

The Judiciary recognises people who act for themselves, known as litigants in person. It publishes guidance on how civil claims are started, defended and taken through each stage.

Court staff will guide users through the process. But officers of the court are not permitted by law to give legal advice, draft documents or help prepare a case.

The right to represent oneself is not the same as the ability to do it well. Knowing the facts is one skill. Turning them into a sound legal argument is another.

The Price of Standing Up for Your Rights

Justice carries a price tag. We do not talk about it nearly enough.

For a wage earner, a lawyer's fees can mean choosing between legal costs and household bills. For a small entrepreneur, an unresolved contract dispute can choke cash flow.

For a retiree, a lifetime of savings may be at stake.

The gap widens when the other side is an organisation able to keep counsel on retainer through years of hearings and appeals.

Money does not decide cases. The better-funded party does not always win, and the unrepresented party is not always right. The concern is whether resources shape a person's ability to prepare, present and sustain a case.

Brunei has made a start. The Law Society of Brunei Darussalam runs a Legal Advice Clinic offering free preliminary advice to unrepresented people earning BND1,500 a month or less.

It is a meaningful service, and the lawyers who volunteer their time deserve credit. For some, it may be the only professional advice they ever receive.

But the clinic offers a consultation, not representation. A citizen may leave knowing exactly where he stands, yet still be unable to afford the lawyer his case requires.

And a household earning BND1,600, with children in school and an ageing parent at home, falls outside the line altogether.

A legal system can have able lawyers, capable judges and sound procedures, and still leave some citizens unable to afford meaningful representation.

I know this road. There was a time when I firmly believed I had been wronged, though not by any court.

What I could afford was one conversation with a lawyer. The other side, with far deeper pockets, was ready to fight for as long as it took. So I let it rest.

Procedure, Evidence and the Pursuit of Fairness

The law demands evidence. Fair enough. The other side must have a fair chance to answer, and courts cannot decide cases on sympathy alone.

Rules protect those principles. Without them, a hearing could become a contest of accusations. But a necessary rule can still be bewildering to someone facing it alone.

Its complexity, however, falls hardest on those who stand alone.

A litigant in person may miss a deadline, misunderstand a direction or bring convincing documents in a form the court cannot accept. He may know his story inside out, yet struggle to make it count in law.

Written submissions raise a quieter issue. Many self-represented parties put their arguments on paper because they cannot argue fluently aloud in a formal setting.

It would help if litigants in person were told plainly, and in advance, how written submissions are received and what form gives their arguments the clearest hearing.

The Magistrates' Court Civil Section offers practical help. Its legal assistants explain filing requirements and the stages of a case, but cannot say whether a claim is likely to succeed.

That limit is right, because court staff must stay impartial. Yet it leaves a gap between knowing how to file a document and knowing whether it helps the case.

And where, exactly, is he supposed to turn for that help?

Records matter just as much. A person weighing an appeal needs to know what was said at trial, and the notes of proceedings may be his only guide.

Reliable audio recording of civil proceedings, wherever practicable and subject to appropriate safeguards, could strengthen the accuracy of court records. It would also provide an additional means of resolving disputes over what was said during a hearing.

Citizens should also know what records exist, how to obtain them and what to do when their accuracy is in question.

Judgments pose a final challenge. A judgment brings legal finality, but not always understanding.

For the losing party, the reasons can matter as much as the result. Yet a carefully reasoned judgment may still be closed to a reader without legal training.

A short plain-language summary of reasons, issued alongside significant civil judgments, would not dilute the law. It would help the public see how decisions are reached, and trust them.

Justice, Benevolence and the National Amanah

In Brunei, justice carries a weight beyond the courtroom. It sits at the heart of Melayu Islam Beraja (MIB), our national philosophy.

The principle of adil dan ihsan, justice and benevolence, frames that responsibility. In Islamic governance, authority is an amanah, a trust demanding fairness, integrity and care for those it serves.

The Holy Quran, in Surah An-Nahl, verse 90, commands both justice and ihsan. One asks that obligations be met. The other asks that they be met with excellence and compassion.

For institutions, these values cannot stay on paper. They must show in daily conduct: how a counter clerk explains a form, how a letter is acknowledged, how a judgment's reasons are made known.

Justice requires the law to be applied impartially. Ihsan asks institutions to notice those whose circumstances leave them at a disadvantage.

Compassion does not override evidence, legal rights or judicial independence. It asks whether processes are understandable, accessible and responsive enough, without bending the law for anyone.

A person who cannot afford a lawyer does not deserve to win because he is disadvantaged. He deserves a real chance to understand his rights, present his case and weigh the consequences of his choices.

That is adil dan ihsan at work, at the counter and in the courtroom.

When Litigation Ends but Questions Remain

Losing a case does not mean justice has failed. A litigant may have had a fair hearing, presented his evidence and lost because the law was not on his side.

But the end of a case does not always end the search for understanding. He may still not know why an argument failed, or why certain evidence was excluded.

He may also carry separate grievances, about professional services or administrative conduct, that belong in different channels altogether.

A concluded judgment cannot simply be reopened because someone dislikes the result. But it should not take another legal battle to find out where a separate complaint belongs.

A citizen who writes to an authority should, at the very least, receive an acknowledgment, learn whether that body has jurisdiction and be told what happens next.

When an issue cuts across several ministries or agencies, someone should be able to tell him which door to knock on first.

Not every complaint is justified, and not every request can be granted. Confidentiality may limit what can be shared. A clear account of the process still goes a long way.

Then there is the human cost. Years of litigation can consume savings, time, health and peace of mind, even where every step was lawful.

Many are left wondering whether seeking redress was worth the sacrifice. For some, the heaviest burden is not knowing when, or how, it will end.

Making Justice More Accessible

Brunei is not starting from nothing. The Judiciary publishes guidance and forms for litigants in person, and offers court mediation in suitable civil disputes.

It has also reported improvements to Small Claims Tribunal procedures and continuing work to strengthen mediation. These are foundations worth building on.

The Judiciary reported that the Magistrates’ Courts achieved a civil case clearance rate of 100 per cent in 2024, compared with 83 per cent in 2023.

It was a notable improvement in case management. But clearing cases efficiently is not the same as making the legal process affordable and understandable.

So what would make a difference before a citizen reaches the courtroom?

An independent legal help desk, supported by a Law Society pro bono roster, could give eligible 
litigants preliminary legal guidance without asking court staff to abandon their impartial role.

Public bodies and regulators could also publish clear complaint-response standards. Acknowledging a letter, naming a contact and explaining where to go next should not feel like favours.

And why not offer plain-language guides in Malay and English, backed by community sessions across the districts? People should learn about mediation and their legal options before a dispute becomes a courtroom battle.

None of this would decide a case in anyone's favour. But before citizens spend years in court, and perhaps their savings, they deserve to know what they are getting into.

That matters to more than litigants. A small business waiting for payment, a family in dispute or a professional defending a contract all need a system they can understand and use.

Justice Must Be Within Reach

The strength of a legal system is not measured only by the sophistication of its laws or the authority of its courts. It is also measured by the experience of those who must use it.

Brunei’s aspirations under Wawasan Brunei 2035 include a high quality of life and a dynamic, sustainable economy. Both depend, in part, on effective governance, public confidence and an environment where citizens and businesses can understand and exercise their legal rights.

Justice does not mean everyone wins. It means everyone is fairly heard, with every decision resting on law and evidence.

That promise must hold beyond the pages of a statute book. For the ordinary citizen, the hardest part may not be the courtroom, but the long, costly and confusing road to reach it.

Justice must never become a privilege understood only by those who can afford to have it explained.

For a nation guided by adil dan ihsan, making justice understandable and within reach is no mere matter of legal services.

It is part of the amanah of good governance.

 

KopiTalk with MHO

Independent perspectives on issues that matter to Brunei Darussalam.