MOFE initially imposed a $5/kg excise duty rate on certain plastic products in an effort to reduce plastic usage and its environmental impact. However, the ministry later suspended the tax and imposed a 5% excise duty rate instead. This move has been met with criticism from stakeholders, who argue that it was made without proper consultation and planning.
Critics also point out that the reversal benefits businesses at the expense of the environment. They argue that the government should focus on addressing the underlying issue of irresponsible waste disposal habits and the lack of public education on proper garbage management.
The public debate surrounding the plastic import tax reversal has also raised broader concerns about the country's economic situation and the potential impact on prices and poverty. The government's failure to provide a comprehensive solution, such as promoting recycling infrastructure or encouraging sustainable alternatives, only exacerbates these concerns.
Overall, MOFE's flip-flopping on the plastic import tax has been met with criticism and skepticism. The ministry's disregard for stakeholders, inconsistent decision-making, and failure to address the larger issue of plastic waste management raise serious doubts about its ability to effectively tackle environmental challenges and promote sustainable practices. MHO/07/23
